Mercurial > hg > CbC > CbC_gcc
comparison libobjc/README @ 111:04ced10e8804
gcc 7
author | kono |
---|---|
date | Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:46:09 +0900 |
parents | |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
68:561a7518be6b | 111:04ced10e8804 |
---|---|
1 | |
2 GNU Objective C notes | |
3 ********************* | |
4 | |
5 This document is to explain what has been done, and a little about how | |
6 specific features differ from other implementations. The runtime has | |
7 been completely rewritten in gcc 2.4. The earlier runtime had several | |
8 severe bugs and was rather incomplete. The compiler has had several | |
9 new features added as well. | |
10 | |
11 This is not documentation for Objective C, it is usable to someone | |
12 who knows Objective C from somewhere else. | |
13 | |
14 | |
15 Runtime API functions | |
16 ===================== | |
17 | |
18 The runtime is modeled after the NeXT Objective C runtime. That is, | |
19 most functions have semantics as it is known from the NeXT. The | |
20 names, however, have changed. All runtime API functions have names | |
21 of lowercase letters and underscores as opposed to the | |
22 `traditional' mixed case names. | |
23 The runtime api functions are not documented as of now. | |
24 Someone offered to write it, and did it, but we were not allowed to | |
25 use it by his university (Very sad story). We have started writing | |
26 the documentation over again. This will be announced in appropriate | |
27 places when it becomes available. | |
28 | |
29 | |
30 Protocols | |
31 ========= | |
32 | |
33 Protocols are now fully supported. The semantics is exactly as on the | |
34 NeXT. There is a flag to specify how protocols should be typechecked | |
35 when adopted to classes. The normal typechecker requires that all | |
36 methods in a given protocol must be implemented in the class that | |
37 adopts it -- it is not enough to inherit them. The flag | |
38 `-Wno-protocol' causes it to allow inherited methods, while | |
39 `-Wprotocols' is the default which requires them defined. | |
40 | |
41 | |
42 +load | |
43 =========== | |
44 This method, if defined, is called for each class and category | |
45 implementation when the class is loaded into the runtime. This method | |
46 is not inherited, and is thus not called for a subclass that doesn't | |
47 define it itself. Thus, each +load method is called exactly once by | |
48 the runtime. The runtime invocation of this method is thread safe. | |
49 | |
50 | |
51 +initialize | |
52 =========== | |
53 | |
54 This method, if defined, is called before any other instance or class | |
55 methods of that particular class. For the GNU runtime, this method is | |
56 not inherited, and is thus not called as initializer for a subclass that | |
57 doesn't define it itself. Thus, each +initialize method is called exactly | |
58 once by the runtime (or never if no methods of that particular class is | |
59 never called). It is wise to guard against multiple invocations anyway | |
60 to remain portable with the NeXT runtime. The runtime invocation of | |
61 this method is thread safe. | |
62 | |
63 | |
64 Passivation/Activation/Typedstreams | |
65 =================================== | |
66 | |
67 This is supported in the style of NeXT TypedStream's. Consult the | |
68 headerfile Typedstreams.h for api functions. I (Kresten) have | |
69 rewritten it in Objective C, but this implementation is not part of | |
70 2.4, it is available from the GNU Objective C prerelease archive. | |
71 There is one difference worth noting concerning objects stored with | |
72 objc_write_object_reference (aka NXWriteObjectReference). When these | |
73 are read back in, their object is not guaranteed to be available until | |
74 the `-awake' method is called in the object that requests that object. | |
75 To objc_read_object you must pass a pointer to an id, which is valid | |
76 after exit from the function calling it (like e.g. an instance | |
77 variable). In general, you should not use objects read in until the | |
78 -awake method is called. | |
79 | |
80 | |
81 Acknowledgements | |
82 ================ | |
83 | |
84 The GNU Objective C team: Geoffrey Knauth <gsk@marble.com> (manager), | |
85 Tom Wood <wood@next.com> (compiler) and Kresten Krab Thorup | |
86 <krab@iesd.auc.dk> (runtime) would like to thank a some people for | |
87 participating in the development of the present GNU Objective C. | |
88 | |
89 Paul Burchard <burchard@geom.umn.edu> and Andrew McCallum | |
90 <mccallum@cs.rochester.edu> has been very helpful debugging the | |
91 runtime. Eric Herring <herring@iesd.auc.dk> has been very helpful | |
92 cleaning up after the documentation-copyright disaster and is now | |
93 helping with the new documentation. | |
94 | |
95 Steve Naroff <snaroff@next.com> and Richard Stallman | |
96 <rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu> has been very helpful with implementation details | |
97 in the compiler. | |
98 | |
99 | |
100 Bug Reports | |
101 =========== | |
102 | |
103 Please read the section `Submitting Bugreports' of the gcc manual | |
104 before you submit any bugs. |