diff gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic-invalid-2.c @ 111:04ced10e8804

gcc 7
author kono
date Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:46:09 +0900
parents
children
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/atomic-invalid-2.c	Fri Oct 27 22:46:09 2017 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+/* PR c/69104.  Test atomic routines for invalid memory model errors.  This
+   only needs to be tested on a single size.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target sync_int_long } */
+
+#include <stdatomic.h>
+
+/* atomic_store_explicit():
+   The order argument shall not be memory_order_acquire,
+   memory_order_consume, nor memory_order_acq_rel.  */
+
+void
+store (atomic_int *i)
+{
+  atomic_store_explicit (i, 0, memory_order_consume); /* { dg-warning "invalid memory model" } */
+  atomic_store_explicit (i, 0, memory_order_acquire); /* { dg-warning "invalid memory model" } */
+  atomic_store_explicit (i, 0, memory_order_acq_rel); /* { dg-warning "invalid memory model" } */
+}
+
+/* atomic_load_explicit():
+   The order argument shall not be memory_order_release nor
+   memory_order_acq_rel.  */
+
+void
+load (atomic_int *i)
+{
+  atomic_int j = atomic_load_explicit (i, memory_order_release); /* { dg-warning "invalid memory model" } */
+  atomic_int k = atomic_load_explicit (i, memory_order_acq_rel); /* { dg-warning "invalid memory model" } */
+}
+
+/* atomic_compare_exchange():
+   The failure argument shall not be memory_order_release nor
+   memory_order_acq_rel.  The failure argument shall be no stronger than the
+   success argument.  */
+
+void
+exchange (atomic_int *i)
+{
+  int r;
+
+  atomic_compare_exchange_strong_explicit (i, &r, 0, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_order_release); /* { dg-warning "invalid failure memory" } */
+  atomic_compare_exchange_strong_explicit (i, &r, 0, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_order_acq_rel); /* { dg-warning "invalid failure memory" } */
+  atomic_compare_exchange_strong_explicit (i, &r, 0, memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_consume); /* { dg-warning "failure memory model cannot be stronger" } */
+
+  atomic_compare_exchange_weak_explicit (i, &r, 0, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_order_release); /* { dg-warning "invalid failure memory" } */
+  atomic_compare_exchange_weak_explicit (i, &r, 0, memory_order_seq_cst, memory_order_acq_rel); /* { dg-warning "invalid failure memory" } */
+  atomic_compare_exchange_weak_explicit (i, &r, 0, memory_order_relaxed, memory_order_consume); /* { dg-warning "failure memory model cannot be stronger" } */
+}
+
+/* atomic_flag_clear():
+   The order argument shall not be memory_order_acquire nor
+   memory_order_acq_rel.  */
+
+void
+clear (atomic_int *i)
+{
+  atomic_flag_clear_explicit (i, memory_order_acquire); /* { dg-warning "invalid memory model" } */
+  atomic_flag_clear_explicit (i, memory_order_acq_rel); /* { dg-warning "invalid memory model" } */
+}