Mercurial > hg > CbC > CbC_gcc
diff gcc/doc/portability.texi @ 0:a06113de4d67
first commit
author | kent <kent@cr.ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:47:48 +0900 |
parents | |
children | 04ced10e8804 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/gcc/doc/portability.texi Fri Jul 17 14:47:48 2009 +0900 @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +@c Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, +@c 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +@c This is part of the GCC manual. +@c For copying conditions, see the file gcc.texi. + +@node Portability +@chapter GCC and Portability +@cindex portability +@cindex GCC and portability + +GCC itself aims to be portable to any machine where @code{int} is at least +a 32-bit type. It aims to target machines with a flat (non-segmented) byte +addressed data address space (the code address space can be separate). +Target ABIs may have 8, 16, 32 or 64-bit @code{int} type. @code{char} +can be wider than 8 bits. + +GCC gets most of the information about the target machine from a machine +description which gives an algebraic formula for each of the machine's +instructions. This is a very clean way to describe the target. But when +the compiler needs information that is difficult to express in this +fashion, ad-hoc parameters have been defined for machine descriptions. +The purpose of portability is to reduce the total work needed on the +compiler; it was not of interest for its own sake. + +@cindex endianness +@cindex autoincrement addressing, availability +@findex abort +GCC does not contain machine dependent code, but it does contain code +that depends on machine parameters such as endianness (whether the most +significant byte has the highest or lowest address of the bytes in a word) +and the availability of autoincrement addressing. In the RTL-generation +pass, it is often necessary to have multiple strategies for generating code +for a particular kind of syntax tree, strategies that are usable for different +combinations of parameters. Often, not all possible cases have been +addressed, but only the common ones or only the ones that have been +encountered. As a result, a new target may require additional +strategies. You will know +if this happens because the compiler will call @code{abort}. Fortunately, +the new strategies can be added in a machine-independent fashion, and will +affect only the target machines that need them.