diff llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/unroll-loop-invalidation.ll @ 150:1d019706d866

LLVM10
author anatofuz
date Thu, 13 Feb 2020 15:10:13 +0900
parents
children 2e18cbf3894f
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/unroll-loop-invalidation.ll	Thu Feb 13 15:10:13 2020 +0900
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+; This test exercises that we don't corrupt a loop-analysis when running loop
+; unrolling in a way that deletes a loop. To do that, we first ensure the
+; analysis is cached, then unroll the loop (deleting it) and make sure that the
+; next function doesn't get a cache "hit" for this stale analysis result.
+;
+; RUN: opt -S -passes='loop(require<access-info>),unroll,loop(print-access-info)' -debug-pass-manager < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+;
+; CHECK: Starting llvm::Function pass manager run.
+; CHECK: Running pass: FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor
+; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAnalysis
+; CHECK: Running analysis: InnerAnalysisManagerProxy<
+; CHECK: Starting Loop pass manager run.
+; CHECK: Running pass: RequireAnalysisPass<{{.*}}LoopAccessAnalysis
+; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on inner1.header
+; CHECK: Finished Loop pass manager run.
+; CHECK: Starting Loop pass manager run.
+; CHECK: Running pass: RequireAnalysisPass<{{.*}}LoopAccessAnalysis
+; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on inner2.header
+; CHECK: Finished Loop pass manager run.
+; CHECK: Starting Loop pass manager run.
+; CHECK: Running pass: RequireAnalysisPass<{{.*}}LoopAccessAnalysis
+; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on outer.header
+; CHECK: Finished Loop pass manager run.
+; CHECK: Running pass: LoopUnrollPass
+; CHECK: Clearing all analysis results for: inner2.header
+; CHECK: Clearing all analysis results for: outer.header
+; CHECK: Invalidating all non-preserved analyses for: test
+; CHECK: Invalidating all non-preserved analyses for: inner1.header
+; CHECK: Invalidating analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on inner1.header
+; CHECK: Invalidating all non-preserved analyses for: inner1.header.1
+; CHECK-NOT: Invalidating analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on inner1.header.1
+; CHECK: Running pass: FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor
+; CHECK: Starting Loop pass manager run.
+; CHECK: Running pass: LoopAccessInfoPrinterPass
+; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on inner1.header
+; CHECK: Loop access info in function 'test':
+; CHECK:   inner1.header:
+; CHECK: Finished Loop pass manager run.
+; CHECK: Starting Loop pass manager run.
+; CHECK: Running pass: LoopAccessInfoPrinterPass
+; CHECK: Running analysis: LoopAccessAnalysis on inner1.header.1
+; CHECK: Loop access info in function 'test':
+; CHECK:   inner1.header.1:
+; CHECK: Finished Loop pass manager run.
+
+target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
+
+define void @test(i32 %inner1.count) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: define void @test(
+bb:
+  br label %outer.ph
+
+outer.ph:
+  br label %outer.header
+
+outer.header:
+  %outer.i = phi i32 [ 0, %outer.ph ], [ %outer.i.next, %outer.latch ]
+  br label %inner1.ph
+
+inner1.ph:
+  br label %inner1.header
+
+inner1.header:
+  %inner1.i = phi i32 [ 0, %inner1.ph ], [ %inner1.i.next, %inner1.header ]
+  %inner1.i.next = add i32 %inner1.i, 1
+  %inner1.cond = icmp eq i32 %inner1.i, %inner1.count
+  br i1 %inner1.cond, label %inner1.exit, label %inner1.header
+; We should have two unrolled copies of this loop and nothing else.
+;
+; CHECK-NOT:     icmp eq
+; CHECK-NOT:     br i1
+; CHECK:         %[[COND1:.*]] = icmp eq i32 %{{.*}}, %inner1.count
+; CHECK:         br i1 %[[COND1]],
+; CHECK-NOT:     icmp eq
+; CHECK-NOT:     br i1
+; CHECK:         %[[COND2:.*]] = icmp eq i32 %{{.*}}, %inner1.count
+; CHECK:         br i1 %[[COND2]],
+; CHECK-NOT:     icmp eq
+; CHECK-NOT:     br i1
+
+
+inner1.exit:
+  br label %inner2.ph
+
+inner2.ph:
+  br label %inner2.header
+
+inner2.header:
+  %inner2.i = phi i32 [ 0, %inner2.ph ], [ %inner2.i.next, %inner2.header ]
+  %inner2.i.next = add i32 %inner2.i, 1
+  %inner2.cond = icmp eq i32 %inner2.i, 4
+  br i1 %inner2.cond, label %inner2.exit, label %inner2.header
+
+inner2.exit:
+  br label %outer.latch
+
+outer.latch:
+  %outer.i.next = add i32 %outer.i, 1
+  %outer.cond = icmp eq i32 %outer.i.next, 2
+  br i1 %outer.cond, label %outer.exit, label %outer.header
+
+outer.exit:
+  br label %exit
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}