Mercurial > hg > Members > kono > Proof > ZF-in-agda
diff src/BAlgbra.agda @ 431:a5f8084b8368
reorganiztion for apkg
author | Shinji KONO <kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 21 Dec 2020 10:23:37 +0900 |
parents | |
children | b27d92694ed5 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/src/BAlgbra.agda Mon Dec 21 10:23:37 2020 +0900 @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ +open import Level +open import Ordinals +module BAlgbra {n : Level } (O : Ordinals {n}) where + +open import zf +open import logic +import OrdUtil +import OD +import ODUtil +import ODC + +open import Relation.Nullary +open import Relation.Binary +open import Data.Empty +open import Relation.Binary +open import Relation.Binary.Core +open import Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality +open import Data.Nat renaming ( zero to Zero ; suc to Suc ; ℕ to Nat ; _⊔_ to _n⊔_ ; _+_ to _n+_ ) + +open inOrdinal O +open Ordinals.Ordinals O +open Ordinals.IsOrdinals isOrdinal +open Ordinals.IsNext isNext +open OrdUtil O +open ODUtil O + +open OD O +open OD.OD +open ODAxiom odAxiom +open HOD + +open _∧_ +open _∨_ +open Bool + +--_∩_ : ( A B : HOD ) → HOD +--A ∩ B = record { od = record { def = λ x → odef A x ∧ odef B x } ; +-- odmax = omin (odmax A) (odmax B) ; <odmax = λ y → min1 (<odmax A (proj1 y)) (<odmax B (proj2 y)) } + +_∪_ : ( A B : HOD ) → HOD +A ∪ B = record { od = record { def = λ x → odef A x ∨ odef B x } ; + odmax = omax (odmax A) (odmax B) ; <odmax = lemma } where + lemma : {y : Ordinal} → odef A y ∨ odef B y → y o< omax (odmax A) (odmax B) + lemma {y} (case1 a) = ordtrans (<odmax A a) (omax-x _ _) + lemma {y} (case2 b) = ordtrans (<odmax B b) (omax-y _ _) + +_\_ : ( A B : HOD ) → HOD +A \ B = record { od = record { def = λ x → odef A x ∧ ( ¬ ( odef B x ) ) }; odmax = odmax A ; <odmax = λ y → <odmax A (proj1 y) } + +∪-Union : { A B : HOD } → Union (A , B) ≡ ( A ∪ B ) +∪-Union {A} {B} = ==→o≡ ( record { eq→ = lemma1 ; eq← = lemma2 } ) where + lemma1 : {x : Ordinal} → odef (Union (A , B)) x → odef (A ∪ B) x + lemma1 {x} lt = lemma3 lt where + lemma4 : {y : Ordinal} → odef (A , B) y ∧ odef (* y) x → ¬ (¬ ( odef A x ∨ odef B x) ) + lemma4 {y} z with proj1 z + lemma4 {y} z | case1 refl = double-neg (case1 ( subst (λ k → odef k x ) *iso (proj2 z)) ) + lemma4 {y} z | case2 refl = double-neg (case2 ( subst (λ k → odef k x ) *iso (proj2 z)) ) + lemma3 : (((u : Ordinal ) → ¬ odef (A , B) u ∧ odef (* u) x) → ⊥) → odef (A ∪ B) x + lemma3 not = ODC.double-neg-eilm O (FExists _ lemma4 not) -- choice + lemma2 : {x : Ordinal} → odef (A ∪ B) x → odef (Union (A , B)) x + lemma2 {x} (case1 A∋x) = subst (λ k → odef (Union (A , B)) k) &iso ( IsZF.union→ isZF (A , B) (* x) A + ⟪ case1 refl , d→∋ A A∋x ⟫ ) + lemma2 {x} (case2 B∋x) = subst (λ k → odef (Union (A , B)) k) &iso ( IsZF.union→ isZF (A , B) (* x) B + ⟪ case2 refl , d→∋ B B∋x ⟫ ) + +∩-Select : { A B : HOD } → Select A ( λ x → ( A ∋ x ) ∧ ( B ∋ x ) ) ≡ ( A ∩ B ) +∩-Select {A} {B} = ==→o≡ ( record { eq→ = lemma1 ; eq← = lemma2 } ) where + lemma1 : {x : Ordinal} → odef (Select A (λ x₁ → (A ∋ x₁) ∧ (B ∋ x₁))) x → odef (A ∩ B) x + lemma1 {x} lt = ⟪ proj1 lt , subst (λ k → odef B k ) &iso (proj2 (proj2 lt)) ⟫ + lemma2 : {x : Ordinal} → odef (A ∩ B) x → odef (Select A (λ x₁ → (A ∋ x₁) ∧ (B ∋ x₁))) x + lemma2 {x} lt = ⟪ proj1 lt , ⟪ d→∋ A (proj1 lt) , d→∋ B (proj2 lt) ⟫ ⟫ + +dist-ord : {p q r : HOD } → p ∩ ( q ∪ r ) ≡ ( p ∩ q ) ∪ ( p ∩ r ) +dist-ord {p} {q} {r} = ==→o≡ ( record { eq→ = lemma1 ; eq← = lemma2 } ) where + lemma1 : {x : Ordinal} → odef (p ∩ (q ∪ r)) x → odef ((p ∩ q) ∪ (p ∩ r)) x + lemma1 {x} lt with proj2 lt + lemma1 {x} lt | case1 q∋x = case1 ⟪ proj1 lt , q∋x ⟫ + lemma1 {x} lt | case2 r∋x = case2 ⟪ proj1 lt , r∋x ⟫ + lemma2 : {x : Ordinal} → odef ((p ∩ q) ∪ (p ∩ r)) x → odef (p ∩ (q ∪ r)) x + lemma2 {x} (case1 p∩q) = ⟪ proj1 p∩q , case1 (proj2 p∩q ) ⟫ + lemma2 {x} (case2 p∩r) = ⟪ proj1 p∩r , case2 (proj2 p∩r ) ⟫ + +dist-ord2 : {p q r : HOD } → p ∪ ( q ∩ r ) ≡ ( p ∪ q ) ∩ ( p ∪ r ) +dist-ord2 {p} {q} {r} = ==→o≡ ( record { eq→ = lemma1 ; eq← = lemma2 } ) where + lemma1 : {x : Ordinal} → odef (p ∪ (q ∩ r)) x → odef ((p ∪ q) ∩ (p ∪ r)) x + lemma1 {x} (case1 cp) = ⟪ case1 cp , case1 cp ⟫ + lemma1 {x} (case2 cqr) = ⟪ case2 (proj1 cqr) , case2 (proj2 cqr) ⟫ + lemma2 : {x : Ordinal} → odef ((p ∪ q) ∩ (p ∪ r)) x → odef (p ∪ (q ∩ r)) x + lemma2 {x} lt with proj1 lt | proj2 lt + lemma2 {x} lt | case1 cp | _ = case1 cp + lemma2 {x} lt | _ | case1 cp = case1 cp + lemma2 {x} lt | case2 cq | case2 cr = case2 ⟪ cq , cr ⟫ + +record IsBooleanAlgebra ( L : Set n) + ( b1 : L ) + ( b0 : L ) + ( -_ : L → L ) + ( _+_ : L → L → L ) + ( _x_ : L → L → L ) : Set (suc n) where + field + +-assoc : {a b c : L } → a + ( b + c ) ≡ (a + b) + c + x-assoc : {a b c : L } → a x ( b x c ) ≡ (a x b) x c + +-sym : {a b : L } → a + b ≡ b + a + -sym : {a b : L } → a x b ≡ b x a + +-aab : {a b : L } → a + ( a x b ) ≡ a + x-aab : {a b : L } → a x ( a + b ) ≡ a + +-dist : {a b c : L } → a + ( b x c ) ≡ ( a x b ) + ( a x c ) + x-dist : {a b c : L } → a x ( b + c ) ≡ ( a + b ) x ( a + c ) + a+0 : {a : L } → a + b0 ≡ a + ax1 : {a : L } → a x b1 ≡ a + a+-a1 : {a : L } → a + ( - a ) ≡ b1 + ax-a0 : {a : L } → a x ( - a ) ≡ b0 + +record BooleanAlgebra ( L : Set n) : Set (suc n) where + field + b1 : L + b0 : L + -_ : L → L + _+_ : L → L → L + _x_ : L → L → L + isBooleanAlgebra : IsBooleanAlgebra L b1 b0 -_ _+_ _x_ +