Mercurial > hg > Members > kono > Proof > ZF-in-agda
view src/NSet.agda @ 1324:1eefc6600354
...
author | Shinji KONO <kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 11 Jun 2023 18:49:13 +0900 |
parents | 40345abc0949 |
children | ca5bfb401ada |
line wrap: on
line source
open import Level module NSet (n : Level) where open import logic open import nat open import Data.Nat hiding (suc ; zero) open import Data.Nat.Properties open import Relation.Binary hiding (_⇔_) open import Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality hiding ( [_] ) -- -- Primitive Set on ℕ -- record NSet : Set (suc zero) where field def : ℕ → Set -- -- Set as an equation on ℕ -- eqa1 : NSet eqa1 = record { def = λ x → x * x + 6 ≡ 5 * x } open NSet _∋_ : NSet → ℕ → Set S ∋ x = def S x eq1∋2 : eqa1 ∋ 2 eq1∋2 = refl eq1∋3 : eqa1 ∋ 3 eq1∋3 = refl -- -- The solution -- eqa2 : NSet eqa2 = record { def = λ x → (x ≡ 2) ∨ ( x ≡ 3 ) } eq2∋3 : eqa2 ∋ 3 eq2∋3 = case2 refl record _==_ ( a b : NSet ) : Set where field eq→ : ∀ { x : ℕ } → def a x → def b x eq← : ∀ { x : ℕ } → def b x → def a x _⊆_ : (a b : NSet ) → Set _⊆_ a b = ∀ {x : ℕ} → def a x → def b x eq2⊆eq1 : eqa2 ⊆ eqa1 eq2⊆eq1 {2} (case1 refl) = refl eq2⊆eq1 {3} (case2 refl) = refl -- the other way is slightly difficut data ⊥ : Set where ⊥-elim : {A : Set } → ⊥ → A ⊥-elim () ¬_ : Set → Set ¬ A = A → ⊥ n∅ : NSet n∅ = record { def = λ y → y < 0 } ¬n∅∋x : {x : ℕ } → ¬ ( n∅ ∋ x ) ¬n∅∋x () ¬n∅∋x' : {x : ℕ } → ¬ ( n∅ ∋ x ) ¬n∅∋x' {x} nx = ⊥-elim ( n1 nx ) where n1 : x < 0 → ⊥ n1 () -- -- Set of subset of ℕ -- record NSetSet : Set (suc zero) where field ndef : NSet → Set open NSetSet record _=n=_ ( a b : NSetSet ) : Set (suc zero) where field eq→ : ∀ { x : NSet } → ndef a x → ndef b x eq← : ∀ { x : NSet } → ndef b x → ndef a x eqa3 : NSetSet eqa3 = record { ndef = λ x → x == eqa2 } -- -- Can we defined hierarchy of Set in monothic and consitent way? -- equations on Ordinal is an solution (Ordinal Definable Set) -- but we need some axioms to achive ZF Set Theory --