Mercurial > hg > Members > kono > Proof > automaton
view automaton-in-agda/src/halt.agda @ 270:dd98e7e5d4a5
derive worked but finiteness is difficult
add regular star
author | Shinji KONO <kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 26 Nov 2021 20:02:06 +0900 |
parents | 3fa72793620b |
children | cd91a9f313dd |
line wrap: on
line source
module halt where open import Level renaming ( zero to Zero ; suc to Suc ) open import Data.Nat open import Data.Maybe open import Data.List hiding ([_]) open import Data.Nat.Properties open import Relation.Nullary open import Data.Empty open import Data.Unit open import Relation.Binary.Core hiding (_⇔_) open import Relation.Binary.Definitions open import Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality open import logic record HBijection {n m : Level} (R : Set n) (S : Set m) : Set (n Level.⊔ m) where field fun← : S → R fun→ : R → S fiso← : (x : R) → fun← ( fun→ x ) ≡ x -- normal bijection required below, but we don't need this to show the inconsistency -- fiso→ : (x : S ) → fun→ ( fun← x ) ≡ x injection : {n m : Level} (R : Set n) (S : Set m) (f : R → S ) → Set (n Level.⊔ m) injection R S f = (x y : R) → f x ≡ f y → x ≡ y open HBijection diag : {S : Set } (b : HBijection ( S → Bool ) S) → S → Bool diag b n = not (fun← b n n) diagonal : { S : Set } → ¬ HBijection ( S → Bool ) S diagonal {S} b = diagn1 (fun→ b (diag b) ) refl where diagn1 : (n : S ) → ¬ (fun→ b (diag b) ≡ n ) diagn1 n dn = ¬t=f (diag b n ) ( begin not (diag b n) ≡⟨⟩ not (not fun← b n n) ≡⟨ cong (λ k → not (k n) ) (sym (fiso← b _)) ⟩ not (fun← b (fun→ b (diag b)) n) ≡⟨ cong (λ k → not (fun← b k n) ) dn ⟩ not (fun← b n n) ≡⟨⟩ diag b n ∎ ) where open ≡-Reasoning record TM : Set where field tm : List Bool → Maybe Bool open TM record UTM : Set where field utm : TM encode : TM → List Bool is-tm : (t : TM) → (x : List Bool) → tm utm (encode t ++ x ) ≡ tm t x open UTM open _∧_ open import Axiom.Extensionality.Propositional postulate f-extensionality : { n : Level} → Axiom.Extensionality.Propositional.Extensionality n n record Halt : Set where field halt : (t : TM ) → (x : List Bool ) → Bool is-halt : (t : TM ) → (x : List Bool ) → (halt t x ≡ true ) ⇔ ( (just true ≡ tm t x ) ∨ (just false ≡ tm t x ) ) is-not-halt : (t : TM ) → (x : List Bool ) → (halt t x ≡ false ) ⇔ ( nothing ≡ tm t x ) open Halt TNL : (halt : Halt ) → (utm : UTM) → HBijection (List Bool → Bool) (List Bool) TNL halt utm = record { fun← = λ tm x → Halt.halt halt (UTM.utm utm) (tm ++ x) ; fun→ = λ h → encode utm record { tm = h1 h } ; fiso← = λ h → f-extensionality (λ y → TN1 h y ) } where open ≡-Reasoning h1 : (h : List Bool → Bool) → (x : List Bool ) → Maybe Bool h1 h x with h x ... | true = just true ... | false = nothing tenc : (h : List Bool → Bool) → (y : List Bool) → List Bool tenc h y = encode utm (record { tm = λ x → h1 h x }) ++ y h-nothing : (h : List Bool → Bool) → (y : List Bool) → h y ≡ false → h1 h y ≡ nothing h-nothing h y eq with h y h-nothing h y refl | false = refl h-just : (h : List Bool → Bool) → (y : List Bool) → h y ≡ true → h1 h y ≡ just true h-just h y eq with h y h-just h y refl | true = refl TN1 : (h : List Bool → Bool) → (y : List Bool ) → Halt.halt halt (UTM.utm utm) (tenc h y) ≡ h y TN1 h y with h y | inspect h y ... | true | record { eq = eq1 } = begin Halt.halt halt (UTM.utm utm) (tenc h y) ≡⟨ proj2 (is-halt halt (UTM.utm utm) (tenc h y) ) (case1 (sym tm-tenc)) ⟩ true ∎ where tm-tenc : tm (UTM.utm utm) (tenc h y) ≡ just true tm-tenc = begin tm (UTM.utm utm) (tenc h y) ≡⟨ is-tm utm _ y ⟩ h1 h y ≡⟨ h-just h y eq1 ⟩ just true ∎ ... | false | record { eq = eq1 } = begin Halt.halt halt (UTM.utm utm) (tenc h y) ≡⟨ proj2 (is-not-halt halt (UTM.utm utm) (tenc h y) ) (sym tm-tenc) ⟩ false ∎ where tm-tenc : tm (UTM.utm utm) (tenc h y) ≡ nothing tm-tenc = begin tm (UTM.utm utm) (tenc h y) ≡⟨ is-tm utm _ y ⟩ h1 h y ≡⟨ h-nothing h y eq1 ⟩ nothing ∎ -- the rest of bijection means encoding is unique -- fiso→ : (y : List Bool ) → encode utm record { tm = λ x → h1 (λ tm → Halt.halt halt (UTM.utm utm) tm ) x } ≡ y