Mercurial > hg > Members > kono > Proof > category
view src/Polynominal.agda @ 1051:1948ce61e2f0
... Polynominal arg type
author | Shinji KONO <kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:45:44 +0900 |
parents | 65df341f0937 |
children | 1a237825ea08 |
line wrap: on
line source
{-# OPTIONS --allow-unsolved-metas #-} open import Category open import CCC open import Level open import HomReasoning open import cat-utility module Polynominal { c₁ c₂ ℓ : Level} ( A : Category c₁ c₂ ℓ ) ( C : CCC A ) where open CCC.CCC C open ≈-Reasoning A hiding (_∙_) _∙_ = _[_o_] A -- -- Polynominal (p.57) in Introduction to Higher order categorical logic -- -- Given object a₀ and a of a caterisian closed category A, how does one adjoin an interminate arraow x : a₀ → a to A? -- A[x] based on the `assumption' x, as was done in Section 2 (data φ). The formulas of A[x] are the objects of A and the -- proofs of A[x] are formed from the arrows of A and the new arrow x : a₀ → a by the appropriate ules of inference. -- -- Here, A is actualy A[x]. It contains x and all the arrow generated from x. -- If we can put constraints on rule i (sub : Hom A b c → Set), then A is strictly smaller than A[x], -- that is, a subscategory of A[x]. -- -- i : {b c : Obj A} {k : Hom A b c } → sub k → φ x k -- -- this makes a few changes, but we don't care. -- from page. 51 -- data φ {a ⊤ : Obj A } ( x : Hom A ⊤ a ) : {b c : Obj A } → Hom A b c → Set ( c₁ ⊔ c₂ ⊔ ℓ) where i : {b c : Obj A} {k : Hom A b c } → φ x k ii : φ x {⊤} {a} x iii : {b c' c'' : Obj A } { f : Hom A b c' } { g : Hom A b c'' } (ψ : φ x f ) (χ : φ x g ) → φ x {b} {c' ∧ c''} < f , g > iv : {b c d : Obj A } { f : Hom A d c } { g : Hom A b d } (ψ : φ x f ) (χ : φ x g ) → φ x ( f ∙ g ) v : {b c' c'' : Obj A } { f : Hom A (b ∧ c') c'' } (ψ : φ x f ) → φ x {b} {c'' <= c'} ( f * ) φ-cong : {b c : Obj A} {k k' : Hom A b c } → A [ k ≈ k' ] → φ x k → φ x k' α : {a b c : Obj A } → Hom A (( a ∧ b ) ∧ c ) ( a ∧ ( b ∧ c ) ) α = < π ∙ π , < π' ∙ π , π' > > -- genetate (a ∧ b) → c proof from proof b → c with assumption a -- from page. 51 k : {a ⊤ b c : Obj A } → ( x∈a : Hom A ⊤ a ) → {z : Hom A b c } → ( y : φ {a} x∈a z ) → Hom A (a ∧ b) c k x∈a {k} i = k ∙ π' k x∈a ii = π k x∈a (iii ψ χ ) = < k x∈a ψ , k x∈a χ > k x∈a (iv ψ χ ) = k x∈a ψ ∙ < π , k x∈a χ > k x∈a (v ψ ) = ( k x∈a ψ ∙ α ) * k x∈a (φ-cong eq ψ) = k x∈a ψ toφ : {a ⊤ b c : Obj A } → ( x∈a : Hom A ⊤ a ) → (z : Hom A b c ) → φ {a} x∈a z toφ {a} {⊤} {b} {c} x∈a z = i record Poly (a b ⊤ : Obj A ) : Set (c₁ ⊔ c₂ ⊔ ℓ) where field x : Hom A ⊤ a f : Hom A ⊤ b phi : φ x {⊤} {b} f record PHom {a ⊤ : Obj A } { x : Hom A ⊤ a } (b c : Obj A) : Set (c₁ ⊔ c₂ ⊔ ℓ) where field hom : Hom A b c phi : φ x {b} {c} hom open PHom -- -- Proposition 6.1 -- -- For every polynominal ψ(x) : b → c in an indeterminate x : 1 → a over a cartesian or cartesian closed -- category A there is a unique arrow f : a ∧ b → c in A such that f ∙ < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A b > ≈ ψ(x). -- record Functional-completeness {a : Obj A} ( x : Hom A 1 a ) : Set (c₁ ⊔ c₂ ⊔ ℓ) where field fun : {b c : Obj A} → PHom {a} {1} {x} b c → Hom A (a ∧ b) c fp : {b c : Obj A} → (p : PHom b c) → A [ fun p ∙ < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A b > ≈ hom p ] uniq : {b c : Obj A} → (p : PHom b c) → (f : Hom A (a ∧ b) c) → A [ f ∙ < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A b > ≈ hom p ] → A [ f ≈ fun p ] -- f ≡ λ (x ∈ a) → φ x , ∃ (f : b <= a) → f ∙ x ≈ φ x record Fc {a b : Obj A } ( φ : Poly a b 1 ) : Set ( suc c₁ ⊔ suc c₂ ⊔ suc ℓ ) where field sl : Hom A a b g : Hom A 1 (b <= a) g = (A [ A [ A [ sl o π ] o < id1 A _ , ○ a > ] o π' ] ) * field isSelect : A [ A [ ε o < g , Poly.x φ > ] ≈ Poly.f φ ] isUnique : (f : Hom A 1 (b <= a) ) → A [ A [ ε o < f , Poly.x φ > ] ≈ Poly.f φ ] → A [ g ≈ f ] -- functional completeness FC : {a b : Obj A} → (φ : Poly a b 1 ) → Fc {a} {b} φ FC {a} {b} φ = record { sl = A [ k (Poly.x φ ) (Poly.phi φ) o < id1 A _ , ○ a > ] ; isSelect = {!!} ; isUnique = {!!} } π-cong = IsCCC.π-cong isCCC e2 = IsCCC.e2 isCCC -- {-# TERMINATING #-} functional-completeness : {a : Obj A} ( x : Hom A 1 a ) → Functional-completeness x functional-completeness {a} x = record { fun = λ y → k x (phi y) ; fp = fc0 ; uniq = uniq } where open φ fc0 : {b c : Obj A} (p : PHom b c) → A [ k x (phi p) ∙ < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A b > ≈ hom p ] fc0 {b} {c} p with phi p ... | i {_} {_} {s} = begin (s ∙ π') ∙ < ( x ∙ ○ b ) , id1 A b > ≈↑⟨ assoc ⟩ s ∙ (π' ∙ < ( x ∙ ○ b ) , id1 A b >) ≈⟨ cdr (IsCCC.e3b isCCC ) ⟩ s ∙ id1 A b ≈⟨ idR ⟩ s ∎ ... | ii = begin π ∙ < ( x ∙ ○ b ) , id1 A b > ≈⟨ IsCCC.e3a isCCC ⟩ x ∙ ○ b ≈↑⟨ cdr (e2 ) ⟩ x ∙ id1 A b ≈⟨ idR ⟩ x ∎ ... | iii {_} {_} {_} {f} {g} y z = begin < k x y , k x z > ∙ < (x ∙ ○ b ) , id1 A b > ≈⟨ IsCCC.distr-π isCCC ⟩ < k x y ∙ < (x ∙ ○ b ) , id1 A b > , k x z ∙ < (x ∙ ○ b ) , id1 A b > > ≈⟨ π-cong (fc0 record { hom = f ; phi = y } ) (fc0 record { hom = g ; phi = z } ) ⟩ < f , g > ≈⟨⟩ hom p ∎ ... | iv {_} {_} {d} {f} {g} y z = begin (k x y ∙ < π , k x z >) ∙ < ( x ∙ ○ b ) , id1 A b > ≈↑⟨ assoc ⟩ k x y ∙ ( < π , k x z > ∙ < ( x ∙ ○ b ) , id1 A b > ) ≈⟨ cdr (IsCCC.distr-π isCCC) ⟩ k x y ∙ ( < π ∙ < ( x ∙ ○ b ) , id1 A b > , k x z ∙ < ( x ∙ ○ b ) , id1 A b > > ) ≈⟨ cdr (π-cong (IsCCC.e3a isCCC) (fc0 record { hom = g ; phi = z} ) ) ⟩ k x y ∙ ( < x ∙ ○ b , g > ) ≈↑⟨ cdr (π-cong (cdr (e2)) refl-hom ) ⟩ k x y ∙ ( < x ∙ ( ○ d ∙ g ) , g > ) ≈⟨ cdr (π-cong assoc (sym idL)) ⟩ k x y ∙ ( < (x ∙ ○ d) ∙ g , id1 A d ∙ g > ) ≈↑⟨ cdr (IsCCC.distr-π isCCC) ⟩ k x y ∙ ( < x ∙ ○ d , id1 A d > ∙ g ) ≈⟨ assoc ⟩ (k x y ∙ < x ∙ ○ d , id1 A d > ) ∙ g ≈⟨ car (fc0 record { hom = f ; phi = y }) ⟩ f ∙ g ∎ ... | v {_} {_} {_} {f} y = begin ( (k x y ∙ < π ∙ π , < π' ∙ π , π' > >) *) ∙ < x ∙ (○ b) , id1 A b > ≈⟨ IsCCC.distr-* isCCC ⟩ ( (k x y ∙ < π ∙ π , < π' ∙ π , π' > >) ∙ < < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π , π' > ) * ≈⟨ IsCCC.*-cong isCCC ( begin ( k x y ∙ < π ∙ π , < π' ∙ π , π' > >) ∙ < < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π , π' > ≈↑⟨ assoc ⟩ k x y ∙ ( < π ∙ π , < π' ∙ π , π' > > ∙ < < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π , π' > ) ≈⟨ cdr (IsCCC.distr-π isCCC) ⟩ k x y ∙ < (π ∙ π) ∙ < < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π , π' > , < π' ∙ π , π' > ∙ < < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π , π' > > ≈⟨ cdr (π-cong (sym assoc) (IsCCC.distr-π isCCC )) ⟩ k x y ∙ < π ∙ (π ∙ < < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π , π' > ) , < (π' ∙ π) ∙ < < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π , π' > , π' ∙ < < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π , π' > > > ≈⟨ cdr ( π-cong (cdr (IsCCC.e3a isCCC))( π-cong (sym assoc) (IsCCC.e3b isCCC) )) ⟩ k x y ∙ < π ∙ ( < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π ) , < π' ∙ (π ∙ < < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π , π' >) , π' > > ≈⟨ cdr ( π-cong refl-hom ( π-cong (cdr (IsCCC.e3a isCCC)) refl-hom )) ⟩ k x y ∙ < (π ∙ ( < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π ) ) , < π' ∙ (< x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ∙ π ) , π' > > ≈⟨ cdr ( π-cong assoc (π-cong assoc refl-hom )) ⟩ k x y ∙ < (π ∙ < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ) ∙ π , < (π' ∙ < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A _ > ) ∙ π , π' > > ≈⟨ cdr (π-cong (car (IsCCC.e3a isCCC)) (π-cong (car (IsCCC.e3b isCCC)) refl-hom )) ⟩ k x y ∙ < ( (x ∙ ○ b ) ∙ π ) , < id1 A _ ∙ π , π' > > ≈⟨ cdr (π-cong (sym assoc) (π-cong idL refl-hom )) ⟩ k x y ∙ < x ∙ (○ b ∙ π ) , < π , π' > > ≈⟨ cdr (π-cong (cdr (e2)) (IsCCC.π-id isCCC) ) ⟩ k x y ∙ < x ∙ ○ _ , id1 A _ > ≈⟨ fc0 record { hom = f ; phi = y} ⟩ f ∎ ) ⟩ f * ∎ ... | φ-cong {_} {_} {f} {f'} f=f' y = trans-hom (fc0 record { hom = f ; phi = y}) f=f' -- -- f ∙ < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A b > ≈ hom p → f ≈ k x (phi p) -- uniq : {b c : Obj A} (p : PHom b c) (f : Hom A (a ∧ b) c) → A [ f ∙ < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A b > ≈ hom p ] → A [ f ≈ k x (phi p) ] uniq {b} {c} p f fx=p = sym (begin k x (phi p) ≈⟨ fc1 p ⟩ k x {hom p} i ≈⟨⟩ hom p ∙ π' ≈↑⟨ car fx=p ⟩ (f ∙ < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A b > ) ∙ π' ≈↑⟨ assoc ⟩ f ∙ (< x ∙ ○ b , id1 A b > ∙ π') ≈⟨ cdr (IsCCC.distr-π isCCC) ⟩ f ∙ < (x ∙ ○ b) ∙ π' , id1 A b ∙ π' > ≈⟨⟩ f ∙ < k x {x ∙ ○ b} i , id1 A b ∙ π' > ≈⟨ cdr (π-cong (sym (fc1 record { hom = x ∙ ○ b ; phi = iv ii i } )) refl-hom) ⟩ f ∙ < k x (phi record { hom = x ∙ ○ b ; phi = iv ii i }) , id1 A b ∙ π' > ≈⟨ cdr (π-cong refl-hom idL) ⟩ f ∙ < π ∙ < π , (○ b ∙ π' ) > , π' > ≈⟨ cdr (π-cong (IsCCC.e3a isCCC) refl-hom) ⟩ f ∙ < π , π' > ≈⟨ cdr (IsCCC.π-id isCCC) ⟩ f ∙ id1 A _ ≈⟨ idR ⟩ f ∎ ) where fc1 : {b c : Obj A} (p : PHom b c) → A [ k x (phi p) ≈ k x {hom p} i ] -- it looks like (*) in page 60 fc1 {b} {c} p with phi p ... | i = refl-hom ... | ii = {!!} -- it doesn't look good ... | iii t t₁ = {!!} ... | iv t t₁ = {!!} ... | v t = {!!} ... | φ-cong x t = {!!} -- fc1 {b} {c} p = uniq record { hom = hom p ; phi = i } ( k x (phi p)) ( begin -- non terminating because of the record, which we may avoid -- k x (phi p) ∙ < x ∙ ○ b , id1 A b > ≈⟨ fc0 p ⟩ -- hom p ∎ ) -- end