Mercurial > hg > Members > tobaru > cbc > CbC_llvm
view docs/HistoricalNotes/2000-12-06-EncodingIdea.txt @ 107:a03ddd01be7e
resolve warnings
author | Kaito Tokumori <e105711@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 31 Jan 2016 17:34:49 +0900 |
parents | 95c75e76d11b |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
From: Chris Lattner [mailto:sabre@nondot.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 6:41 PM To: Vikram S. Adve Subject: Additional idea with respect to encoding Here's another idea with respect to keeping the common case instruction size down (less than 32 bits ideally): Instead of encoding an instruction to operate on two register numbers, have it operate on two negative offsets based on the current register number. Therefore, instead of using: r57 = add r55, r56 (r57 is the implicit dest register, of course) We could use: r57 = add -2, -1 My guess is that most SSA references are to recent values (especially if they correspond to expressions like (x+y*z+p*q/ ...), so the negative numbers would tend to stay small, even at the end of the procedure (where the implicit register destination number could be quite large). Of course the negative sign is reduntant, so you would be storing small integers almost all of the time, and 5-6 bits worth of register number would be plenty for most cases... What do you think? -Chris