Mercurial > hg > Members > tobaru > cbc > CbC_llvm
view test/CodeGen/X86/tail-call-attrs.ll @ 33:e4204d083e25
LLVM 3.5
author | Kaito Tokumori <e105711@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:32:10 +0900 |
parents | 95c75e76d11b |
children | 1172e4bd9c6f |
line wrap: on
line source
; RUN: llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin -o - %s | FileCheck %s ; Simple case: completely identical returns, even with extensions, shouldn't be ; a barrier to tail calls. declare zeroext i1 @give_bool() define zeroext i1 @test_bool() { ; CHECK-LABEL: test_bool: ; CHECK: jmp %call = tail call zeroext i1 @give_bool() ret i1 %call } ; Here, there's more zero extension to be done between the call and the return, ; so a tail call is impossible (well, according to current Clang practice ; anyway. The AMD64 ABI isn't crystal clear on the matter). declare zeroext i32 @give_i32() define zeroext i8 @test_i32() { ; CHECK-LABEL: test_i32: ; CHECK: callq _give_i32 ; CHECK: movzbl %al, %eax ; CHECK: ret %call = tail call zeroext i32 @give_i32() %val = trunc i32 %call to i8 ret i8 %val } ; Here, one function is zeroext and the other is signext. To the extent that ; these both mean something they are incompatible so no tail call is possible. declare zeroext i16 @give_unsigned_i16() define signext i16 @test_incompatible_i16() { ; CHECK-LABEL: test_incompatible_i16: ; CHECK: callq _give_unsigned_i16 ; CHECK: cwtl ; CHECK: ret %call = tail call zeroext i16 @give_unsigned_i16() ret i16 %call } declare inreg i32 @give_i32_inreg() define i32 @test_inreg_to_normal() { ; CHECK-LABEL: test_inreg_to_normal: ; CHECK: callq _give_i32_inreg ; CHECK: ret %val = tail call inreg i32 @give_i32_inreg() ret i32 %val } define inreg i32 @test_normal_to_inreg() { ; CHECK-LABEL: test_normal_to_inreg: ; CHECK: callq _give_i32 ; CHECK: ret %val = tail call i32 @give_i32() ret i32 %val }