|
150
|
1 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -fsyntax-only -verify -fms-compatibility -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
|
|
|
2 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 %s -fsyntax-only -verify -fms-compatibility -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4 // FIXME: Should -fms-compatibility soften these errors into warnings to match
|
|
|
5 // MSVC? In practice, MSVC never implemented dynamic exception specifiers, so
|
|
|
6 // there isn't much Windows code in the wild that uses them.
|
|
|
7 #if __cplusplus >= 201703L
|
|
|
8 // expected-error@+3 {{ISO C++17 does not allow dynamic exception specifications}}
|
|
|
9 // expected-note@+2 {{use 'noexcept(false)' instead}}
|
|
|
10 #endif
|
|
|
11 void f() throw(...) { }
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13 namespace PR28080 {
|
|
|
14 struct S; // expected-note {{forward declaration}}
|
|
|
15 #if __cplusplus >= 201703L
|
|
|
16 // expected-error@+3 {{ISO C++17 does not allow dynamic exception specifications}}
|
|
|
17 // expected-note@+2 {{use 'noexcept(false)' instead}}
|
|
|
18 #endif
|
|
|
19 void fn() throw(S); // expected-warning {{incomplete type}} expected-note{{previous declaration}}
|
|
|
20 void fn() throw(); // expected-warning {{does not match previous declaration}}
|
|
|
21 }
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23 template <typename T> struct FooPtr {
|
|
|
24 template <typename U> FooPtr(U *p) : m_pT(nullptr) {}
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26 template <>
|
|
|
27 // FIXME: It would be better if this note pointed at the primary template
|
|
|
28 // above.
|
|
|
29 // expected-note@+1 {{previous declaration is here}}
|
|
|
30 FooPtr(T *pInterface) throw() // expected-warning {{exception specification in declaration does not match previous declaration}}
|
|
|
31 : m_pT(pInterface) {}
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33 T *m_pT;
|
|
|
34 };
|
|
|
35 struct Bar {};
|
|
|
36 template struct FooPtr<Bar>; // expected-note {{requested here}}
|
