Mercurial > hg > Members > kono > Proof > ZF-in-agda
comparison src/OPair.agda @ 431:a5f8084b8368
reorganiztion for apkg
author | Shinji KONO <kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 21 Dec 2020 10:23:37 +0900 |
parents | |
children | 55ab5de1ae02 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
430:28c7be8f252c | 431:a5f8084b8368 |
---|---|
1 {-# OPTIONS --allow-unsolved-metas #-} | |
2 | |
3 open import Level | |
4 open import Ordinals | |
5 module OPair {n : Level } (O : Ordinals {n}) where | |
6 | |
7 open import zf | |
8 open import logic | |
9 import OD | |
10 import ODUtil | |
11 import OrdUtil | |
12 | |
13 open import Relation.Nullary | |
14 open import Relation.Binary | |
15 open import Data.Empty | |
16 open import Relation.Binary | |
17 open import Relation.Binary.Core | |
18 open import Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality | |
19 open import Data.Nat renaming ( zero to Zero ; suc to Suc ; ℕ to Nat ; _⊔_ to _n⊔_ ) | |
20 | |
21 open OD O | |
22 open OD.OD | |
23 open OD.HOD | |
24 open ODAxiom odAxiom | |
25 | |
26 open Ordinals.Ordinals O | |
27 open Ordinals.IsOrdinals isOrdinal | |
28 open Ordinals.IsNext isNext | |
29 open OrdUtil O | |
30 open ODUtil O | |
31 | |
32 open _∧_ | |
33 open _∨_ | |
34 open Bool | |
35 | |
36 open _==_ | |
37 | |
38 <_,_> : (x y : HOD) → HOD | |
39 < x , y > = (x , x ) , (x , y ) | |
40 | |
41 exg-pair : { x y : HOD } → (x , y ) =h= ( y , x ) | |
42 exg-pair {x} {y} = record { eq→ = left ; eq← = right } where | |
43 left : {z : Ordinal} → odef (x , y) z → odef (y , x) z | |
44 left (case1 t) = case2 t | |
45 left (case2 t) = case1 t | |
46 right : {z : Ordinal} → odef (y , x) z → odef (x , y) z | |
47 right (case1 t) = case2 t | |
48 right (case2 t) = case1 t | |
49 | |
50 ord≡→≡ : { x y : HOD } → & x ≡ & y → x ≡ y | |
51 ord≡→≡ eq = subst₂ (λ j k → j ≡ k ) *iso *iso ( cong ( λ k → * k ) eq ) | |
52 | |
53 od≡→≡ : { x y : Ordinal } → * x ≡ * y → x ≡ y | |
54 od≡→≡ eq = subst₂ (λ j k → j ≡ k ) &iso &iso ( cong ( λ k → & k ) eq ) | |
55 | |
56 eq-prod : { x x' y y' : HOD } → x ≡ x' → y ≡ y' → < x , y > ≡ < x' , y' > | |
57 eq-prod refl refl = refl | |
58 | |
59 xx=zy→x=y : {x y z : HOD } → ( x , x ) =h= ( z , y ) → x ≡ y | |
60 xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq with trio< (& x) (& y) | |
61 xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c with eq← eq {& y} (case2 refl) | |
62 xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c | case1 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ (sym s) a ) | |
63 xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c | case2 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ (sym s) a ) | |
64 xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri≈ ¬a b ¬c = ord≡→≡ b | |
65 xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c with eq← eq {& y} (case2 refl) | |
66 xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c | case1 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ s c ) | |
67 xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c | case2 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ s c ) | |
68 | |
69 prod-eq : { x x' y y' : HOD } → < x , y > =h= < x' , y' > → (x ≡ x' ) ∧ ( y ≡ y' ) | |
70 prod-eq {x} {x'} {y} {y'} eq = ⟪ lemmax , lemmay ⟫ where | |
71 lemma2 : {x y z : HOD } → ( x , x ) =h= ( z , y ) → z ≡ y | |
72 lemma2 {x} {y} {z} eq = trans (sym (xx=zy→x=y lemma3 )) ( xx=zy→x=y eq ) where | |
73 lemma3 : ( x , x ) =h= ( y , z ) | |
74 lemma3 = ==-trans eq exg-pair | |
75 lemma1 : {x y : HOD } → ( x , x ) =h= ( y , y ) → x ≡ y | |
76 lemma1 {x} {y} eq with eq← eq {& y} (case2 refl) | |
77 lemma1 {x} {y} eq | case1 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) | |
78 lemma1 {x} {y} eq | case2 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) | |
79 lemma4 : {x y z : HOD } → ( x , y ) =h= ( x , z ) → y ≡ z | |
80 lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq with eq← eq {& z} (case2 refl) | |
81 lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq | case1 s with ord≡→≡ s -- x ≡ z | |
82 ... | refl with lemma2 (==-sym eq ) | |
83 ... | refl = refl | |
84 lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq | case2 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) -- y ≡ z | |
85 lemmax : x ≡ x' | |
86 lemmax with eq→ eq {& (x , x)} (case1 refl) | |
87 lemmax | case1 s = lemma1 (ord→== s ) -- (x,x)≡(x',x') | |
88 lemmax | case2 s with lemma2 (ord→== s ) -- (x,x)≡(x',y') with x'≡y' | |
89 ... | refl = lemma1 (ord→== s ) | |
90 lemmay : y ≡ y' | |
91 lemmay with lemmax | |
92 ... | refl with lemma4 eq -- with (x,y)≡(x,y') | |
93 ... | eq1 = lemma4 (ord→== (cong (λ k → & k ) eq1 )) | |
94 | |
95 -- | |
96 -- unlike ordered pair, ZFProduct is not a HOD | |
97 | |
98 data ord-pair : (p : Ordinal) → Set n where | |
99 pair : (x y : Ordinal ) → ord-pair ( & ( < * x , * y > ) ) | |
100 | |
101 ZFProduct : OD | |
102 ZFProduct = record { def = λ x → ord-pair x } | |
103 | |
104 -- open import Relation.Binary.HeterogeneousEquality as HE using (_≅_ ) | |
105 -- eq-pair : { x x' y y' : Ordinal } → x ≡ x' → y ≡ y' → pair x y ≅ pair x' y' | |
106 -- eq-pair refl refl = HE.refl | |
107 | |
108 pi1 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal | |
109 pi1 ( pair x y) = x | |
110 | |
111 π1 : { p : HOD } → def ZFProduct (& p) → HOD | |
112 π1 lt = * (pi1 lt ) | |
113 | |
114 pi2 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal | |
115 pi2 ( pair x y ) = y | |
116 | |
117 π2 : { p : HOD } → def ZFProduct (& p) → HOD | |
118 π2 lt = * (pi2 lt ) | |
119 | |
120 op-cons : { ox oy : Ordinal } → def ZFProduct (& ( < * ox , * oy > )) | |
121 op-cons {ox} {oy} = pair ox oy | |
122 | |
123 def-subst : {Z : OD } {X : Ordinal }{z : OD } {x : Ordinal }→ def Z X → Z ≡ z → X ≡ x → def z x | |
124 def-subst df refl refl = df | |
125 | |
126 p-cons : ( x y : HOD ) → def ZFProduct (& ( < x , y >)) | |
127 p-cons x y = def-subst {_} {_} {ZFProduct} {& (< x , y >)} (pair (& x) ( & y )) refl ( | |
128 let open ≡-Reasoning in begin | |
129 & < * (& x) , * (& y) > | |
130 ≡⟨ cong₂ (λ j k → & < j , k >) *iso *iso ⟩ | |
131 & < x , y > | |
132 ∎ ) | |
133 | |
134 op-iso : { op : Ordinal } → (q : ord-pair op ) → & < * (pi1 q) , * (pi2 q) > ≡ op | |
135 op-iso (pair ox oy) = refl | |
136 | |
137 p-iso : { x : HOD } → (p : def ZFProduct (& x) ) → < π1 p , π2 p > ≡ x | |
138 p-iso {x} p = ord≡→≡ (op-iso p) | |
139 | |
140 p-pi1 : { x y : HOD } → (p : def ZFProduct (& < x , y >) ) → π1 p ≡ x | |
141 p-pi1 {x} {y} p = proj1 ( prod-eq ( ord→== (op-iso p) )) | |
142 | |
143 p-pi2 : { x y : HOD } → (p : def ZFProduct (& < x , y >) ) → π2 p ≡ y | |
144 p-pi2 {x} {y} p = proj2 ( prod-eq ( ord→== (op-iso p))) | |
145 | |
146 ω-pair : {x y : HOD} → {m : Ordinal} → & x o< next m → & y o< next m → & (x , y) o< next m | |
147 ω-pair lx ly = next< (omax<nx lx ly ) ho< | |
148 | |
149 ω-opair : {x y : HOD} → {m : Ordinal} → & x o< next m → & y o< next m → & < x , y > o< next m | |
150 ω-opair {x} {y} {m} lx ly = lemma0 where | |
151 lemma0 : & < x , y > o< next m | |
152 lemma0 = osucprev (begin | |
153 osuc (& < x , y >) | |
154 <⟨ osuc<nx ho< ⟩ | |
155 next (omax (& (x , x)) (& (x , y))) | |
156 ≡⟨ cong (λ k → next k) (sym ( omax≤ _ _ pair-xx<xy )) ⟩ | |
157 next (osuc (& (x , y))) | |
158 ≡⟨ sym (nexto≡) ⟩ | |
159 next (& (x , y)) | |
160 ≤⟨ x<ny→≤next (ω-pair lx ly) ⟩ | |
161 next m | |
162 ∎ ) where | |
163 open o≤-Reasoning O | |
164 | |
165 _⊗_ : (A B : HOD) → HOD | |
166 A ⊗ B = Union ( Replace B (λ b → Replace A (λ a → < a , b > ) )) | |
167 | |
168 product→ : {A B a b : HOD} → A ∋ a → B ∋ b → ( A ⊗ B ) ∋ < a , b > | |
169 product→ {A} {B} {a} {b} A∋a B∋b = λ t → t (& (Replace A (λ a → < a , b >))) | |
170 ⟪ lemma1 , subst (λ k → odef k (& < a , b >)) (sym *iso) lemma2 ⟫ where | |
171 lemma1 : odef (Replace B (λ b₁ → Replace A (λ a₁ → < a₁ , b₁ >))) (& (Replace A (λ a₁ → < a₁ , b >))) | |
172 lemma1 = replacement← B b B∋b | |
173 lemma2 : odef (Replace A (λ a₁ → < a₁ , b >)) (& < a , b >) | |
174 lemma2 = replacement← A a A∋a | |
175 | |
176 x<nextA : {A x : HOD} → A ∋ x → & x o< next (odmax A) | |
177 x<nextA {A} {x} A∋x = ordtrans (c<→o< {x} {A} A∋x) ho< | |
178 | |
179 A<Bnext : {A B x : HOD} → & A o< & B → A ∋ x → & x o< next (odmax B) | |
180 A<Bnext {A} {B} {x} lt A∋x = osucprev (begin | |
181 osuc (& x) | |
182 <⟨ osucc (c<→o< A∋x) ⟩ | |
183 osuc (& A) | |
184 <⟨ osucc lt ⟩ | |
185 osuc (& B) | |
186 <⟨ osuc<nx ho< ⟩ | |
187 next (odmax B) | |
188 ∎ ) where open o≤-Reasoning O | |
189 | |
190 ZFP : (A B : HOD) → HOD | |
191 ZFP A B = record { od = record { def = λ x → ord-pair x ∧ ((p : ord-pair x ) → odef A (pi1 p) ∧ odef B (pi2 p) )} ; | |
192 odmax = omax (next (odmax A)) (next (odmax B)) ; <odmax = λ {y} px → lemma y px } | |
193 where | |
194 lemma : (y : Ordinal) → ( ord-pair y ∧ ((p : ord-pair y) → odef A (pi1 p) ∧ odef B (pi2 p))) → y o< omax (next (odmax A)) (next (odmax B)) | |
195 lemma y lt with proj1 lt | |
196 lemma p lt | pair x y with trio< (& A) (& B) | |
197 lemma p lt | pair x y | tri< a ¬b ¬c = ordtrans (ω-opair (A<Bnext a (subst (λ k → odef A k ) (sym &iso) | |
198 (proj1 (proj2 lt (pair x y))))) (lemma1 (proj2 (proj2 lt (pair x y))))) (omax-y _ _ ) where | |
199 lemma1 : odef B y → & (* y) o< next (HOD.odmax B) | |
200 lemma1 lt = x<nextA {B} (d→∋ B lt) | |
201 lemma p lt | pair x y | tri≈ ¬a b ¬c = ordtrans (ω-opair (x<nextA {A} (d→∋ A ((proj1 (proj2 lt (pair x y)))))) lemma2 ) (omax-x _ _ ) where | |
202 lemma2 : & (* y) o< next (HOD.odmax A) | |
203 lemma2 = ordtrans ( subst (λ k → & (* y) o< k ) (sym b) (c<→o< (d→∋ B ((proj2 (proj2 lt (pair x y))))))) ho< | |
204 lemma p lt | pair x y | tri> ¬a ¬b c = ordtrans (ω-opair (x<nextA {A} (d→∋ A ((proj1 (proj2 lt (pair x y)))))) | |
205 (A<Bnext c (subst (λ k → odef B k ) (sym &iso) (proj2 (proj2 lt (pair x y)))))) (omax-x _ _ ) | |
206 | |
207 ZFP⊆⊗ : {A B : HOD} {x : Ordinal} → odef (ZFP A B) x → odef (A ⊗ B) x | |
208 ZFP⊆⊗ {A} {B} {px} ⟪ (pair x y) , p2 ⟫ = product→ (d→∋ A (proj1 (p2 (pair x y) ))) (d→∋ B (proj2 (p2 (pair x y) ))) | |
209 | |
210 -- axiom of choice required | |
211 -- ⊗⊆ZFP : {A B x : HOD} → ( A ⊗ B ) ∋ x → def ZFProduct (& x) | |
212 -- ⊗⊆ZFP {A} {B} {x} lt = subst (λ k → ord-pair (& k )) {!!} op-cons | |
213 |