Mercurial > hg > Members > kono > Proof > ZF-in-agda
diff src/OPair.agda @ 431:a5f8084b8368
reorganiztion for apkg
author | Shinji KONO <kono@ie.u-ryukyu.ac.jp> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 21 Dec 2020 10:23:37 +0900 |
parents | |
children | 55ab5de1ae02 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/src/OPair.agda Mon Dec 21 10:23:37 2020 +0900 @@ -0,0 +1,213 @@ +{-# OPTIONS --allow-unsolved-metas #-} + +open import Level +open import Ordinals +module OPair {n : Level } (O : Ordinals {n}) where + +open import zf +open import logic +import OD +import ODUtil +import OrdUtil + +open import Relation.Nullary +open import Relation.Binary +open import Data.Empty +open import Relation.Binary +open import Relation.Binary.Core +open import Relation.Binary.PropositionalEquality +open import Data.Nat renaming ( zero to Zero ; suc to Suc ; ℕ to Nat ; _⊔_ to _n⊔_ ) + +open OD O +open OD.OD +open OD.HOD +open ODAxiom odAxiom + +open Ordinals.Ordinals O +open Ordinals.IsOrdinals isOrdinal +open Ordinals.IsNext isNext +open OrdUtil O +open ODUtil O + +open _∧_ +open _∨_ +open Bool + +open _==_ + +<_,_> : (x y : HOD) → HOD +< x , y > = (x , x ) , (x , y ) + +exg-pair : { x y : HOD } → (x , y ) =h= ( y , x ) +exg-pair {x} {y} = record { eq→ = left ; eq← = right } where + left : {z : Ordinal} → odef (x , y) z → odef (y , x) z + left (case1 t) = case2 t + left (case2 t) = case1 t + right : {z : Ordinal} → odef (y , x) z → odef (x , y) z + right (case1 t) = case2 t + right (case2 t) = case1 t + +ord≡→≡ : { x y : HOD } → & x ≡ & y → x ≡ y +ord≡→≡ eq = subst₂ (λ j k → j ≡ k ) *iso *iso ( cong ( λ k → * k ) eq ) + +od≡→≡ : { x y : Ordinal } → * x ≡ * y → x ≡ y +od≡→≡ eq = subst₂ (λ j k → j ≡ k ) &iso &iso ( cong ( λ k → & k ) eq ) + +eq-prod : { x x' y y' : HOD } → x ≡ x' → y ≡ y' → < x , y > ≡ < x' , y' > +eq-prod refl refl = refl + +xx=zy→x=y : {x y z : HOD } → ( x , x ) =h= ( z , y ) → x ≡ y +xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq with trio< (& x) (& y) +xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c with eq← eq {& y} (case2 refl) +xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c | case1 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ (sym s) a ) +xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri< a ¬b ¬c | case2 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ (sym s) a ) +xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri≈ ¬a b ¬c = ord≡→≡ b +xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c with eq← eq {& y} (case2 refl) +xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c | case1 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ s c ) +xx=zy→x=y {x} {y} eq | tri> ¬a ¬b c | case2 s = ⊥-elim ( o<¬≡ s c ) + +prod-eq : { x x' y y' : HOD } → < x , y > =h= < x' , y' > → (x ≡ x' ) ∧ ( y ≡ y' ) +prod-eq {x} {x'} {y} {y'} eq = ⟪ lemmax , lemmay ⟫ where + lemma2 : {x y z : HOD } → ( x , x ) =h= ( z , y ) → z ≡ y + lemma2 {x} {y} {z} eq = trans (sym (xx=zy→x=y lemma3 )) ( xx=zy→x=y eq ) where + lemma3 : ( x , x ) =h= ( y , z ) + lemma3 = ==-trans eq exg-pair + lemma1 : {x y : HOD } → ( x , x ) =h= ( y , y ) → x ≡ y + lemma1 {x} {y} eq with eq← eq {& y} (case2 refl) + lemma1 {x} {y} eq | case1 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) + lemma1 {x} {y} eq | case2 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) + lemma4 : {x y z : HOD } → ( x , y ) =h= ( x , z ) → y ≡ z + lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq with eq← eq {& z} (case2 refl) + lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq | case1 s with ord≡→≡ s -- x ≡ z + ... | refl with lemma2 (==-sym eq ) + ... | refl = refl + lemma4 {x} {y} {z} eq | case2 s = ord≡→≡ (sym s) -- y ≡ z + lemmax : x ≡ x' + lemmax with eq→ eq {& (x , x)} (case1 refl) + lemmax | case1 s = lemma1 (ord→== s ) -- (x,x)≡(x',x') + lemmax | case2 s with lemma2 (ord→== s ) -- (x,x)≡(x',y') with x'≡y' + ... | refl = lemma1 (ord→== s ) + lemmay : y ≡ y' + lemmay with lemmax + ... | refl with lemma4 eq -- with (x,y)≡(x,y') + ... | eq1 = lemma4 (ord→== (cong (λ k → & k ) eq1 )) + +-- +-- unlike ordered pair, ZFProduct is not a HOD + +data ord-pair : (p : Ordinal) → Set n where + pair : (x y : Ordinal ) → ord-pair ( & ( < * x , * y > ) ) + +ZFProduct : OD +ZFProduct = record { def = λ x → ord-pair x } + +-- open import Relation.Binary.HeterogeneousEquality as HE using (_≅_ ) +-- eq-pair : { x x' y y' : Ordinal } → x ≡ x' → y ≡ y' → pair x y ≅ pair x' y' +-- eq-pair refl refl = HE.refl + +pi1 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal +pi1 ( pair x y) = x + +π1 : { p : HOD } → def ZFProduct (& p) → HOD +π1 lt = * (pi1 lt ) + +pi2 : { p : Ordinal } → ord-pair p → Ordinal +pi2 ( pair x y ) = y + +π2 : { p : HOD } → def ZFProduct (& p) → HOD +π2 lt = * (pi2 lt ) + +op-cons : { ox oy : Ordinal } → def ZFProduct (& ( < * ox , * oy > )) +op-cons {ox} {oy} = pair ox oy + +def-subst : {Z : OD } {X : Ordinal }{z : OD } {x : Ordinal }→ def Z X → Z ≡ z → X ≡ x → def z x +def-subst df refl refl = df + +p-cons : ( x y : HOD ) → def ZFProduct (& ( < x , y >)) +p-cons x y = def-subst {_} {_} {ZFProduct} {& (< x , y >)} (pair (& x) ( & y )) refl ( + let open ≡-Reasoning in begin + & < * (& x) , * (& y) > + ≡⟨ cong₂ (λ j k → & < j , k >) *iso *iso ⟩ + & < x , y > + ∎ ) + +op-iso : { op : Ordinal } → (q : ord-pair op ) → & < * (pi1 q) , * (pi2 q) > ≡ op +op-iso (pair ox oy) = refl + +p-iso : { x : HOD } → (p : def ZFProduct (& x) ) → < π1 p , π2 p > ≡ x +p-iso {x} p = ord≡→≡ (op-iso p) + +p-pi1 : { x y : HOD } → (p : def ZFProduct (& < x , y >) ) → π1 p ≡ x +p-pi1 {x} {y} p = proj1 ( prod-eq ( ord→== (op-iso p) )) + +p-pi2 : { x y : HOD } → (p : def ZFProduct (& < x , y >) ) → π2 p ≡ y +p-pi2 {x} {y} p = proj2 ( prod-eq ( ord→== (op-iso p))) + +ω-pair : {x y : HOD} → {m : Ordinal} → & x o< next m → & y o< next m → & (x , y) o< next m +ω-pair lx ly = next< (omax<nx lx ly ) ho< + +ω-opair : {x y : HOD} → {m : Ordinal} → & x o< next m → & y o< next m → & < x , y > o< next m +ω-opair {x} {y} {m} lx ly = lemma0 where + lemma0 : & < x , y > o< next m + lemma0 = osucprev (begin + osuc (& < x , y >) + <⟨ osuc<nx ho< ⟩ + next (omax (& (x , x)) (& (x , y))) + ≡⟨ cong (λ k → next k) (sym ( omax≤ _ _ pair-xx<xy )) ⟩ + next (osuc (& (x , y))) + ≡⟨ sym (nexto≡) ⟩ + next (& (x , y)) + ≤⟨ x<ny→≤next (ω-pair lx ly) ⟩ + next m + ∎ ) where + open o≤-Reasoning O + +_⊗_ : (A B : HOD) → HOD +A ⊗ B = Union ( Replace B (λ b → Replace A (λ a → < a , b > ) )) + +product→ : {A B a b : HOD} → A ∋ a → B ∋ b → ( A ⊗ B ) ∋ < a , b > +product→ {A} {B} {a} {b} A∋a B∋b = λ t → t (& (Replace A (λ a → < a , b >))) + ⟪ lemma1 , subst (λ k → odef k (& < a , b >)) (sym *iso) lemma2 ⟫ where + lemma1 : odef (Replace B (λ b₁ → Replace A (λ a₁ → < a₁ , b₁ >))) (& (Replace A (λ a₁ → < a₁ , b >))) + lemma1 = replacement← B b B∋b + lemma2 : odef (Replace A (λ a₁ → < a₁ , b >)) (& < a , b >) + lemma2 = replacement← A a A∋a + +x<nextA : {A x : HOD} → A ∋ x → & x o< next (odmax A) +x<nextA {A} {x} A∋x = ordtrans (c<→o< {x} {A} A∋x) ho< + +A<Bnext : {A B x : HOD} → & A o< & B → A ∋ x → & x o< next (odmax B) +A<Bnext {A} {B} {x} lt A∋x = osucprev (begin + osuc (& x) + <⟨ osucc (c<→o< A∋x) ⟩ + osuc (& A) + <⟨ osucc lt ⟩ + osuc (& B) + <⟨ osuc<nx ho< ⟩ + next (odmax B) + ∎ ) where open o≤-Reasoning O + +ZFP : (A B : HOD) → HOD +ZFP A B = record { od = record { def = λ x → ord-pair x ∧ ((p : ord-pair x ) → odef A (pi1 p) ∧ odef B (pi2 p) )} ; + odmax = omax (next (odmax A)) (next (odmax B)) ; <odmax = λ {y} px → lemma y px } + where + lemma : (y : Ordinal) → ( ord-pair y ∧ ((p : ord-pair y) → odef A (pi1 p) ∧ odef B (pi2 p))) → y o< omax (next (odmax A)) (next (odmax B)) + lemma y lt with proj1 lt + lemma p lt | pair x y with trio< (& A) (& B) + lemma p lt | pair x y | tri< a ¬b ¬c = ordtrans (ω-opair (A<Bnext a (subst (λ k → odef A k ) (sym &iso) + (proj1 (proj2 lt (pair x y))))) (lemma1 (proj2 (proj2 lt (pair x y))))) (omax-y _ _ ) where + lemma1 : odef B y → & (* y) o< next (HOD.odmax B) + lemma1 lt = x<nextA {B} (d→∋ B lt) + lemma p lt | pair x y | tri≈ ¬a b ¬c = ordtrans (ω-opair (x<nextA {A} (d→∋ A ((proj1 (proj2 lt (pair x y)))))) lemma2 ) (omax-x _ _ ) where + lemma2 : & (* y) o< next (HOD.odmax A) + lemma2 = ordtrans ( subst (λ k → & (* y) o< k ) (sym b) (c<→o< (d→∋ B ((proj2 (proj2 lt (pair x y))))))) ho< + lemma p lt | pair x y | tri> ¬a ¬b c = ordtrans (ω-opair (x<nextA {A} (d→∋ A ((proj1 (proj2 lt (pair x y)))))) + (A<Bnext c (subst (λ k → odef B k ) (sym &iso) (proj2 (proj2 lt (pair x y)))))) (omax-x _ _ ) + +ZFP⊆⊗ : {A B : HOD} {x : Ordinal} → odef (ZFP A B) x → odef (A ⊗ B) x +ZFP⊆⊗ {A} {B} {px} ⟪ (pair x y) , p2 ⟫ = product→ (d→∋ A (proj1 (p2 (pair x y) ))) (d→∋ B (proj2 (p2 (pair x y) ))) + +-- axiom of choice required +-- ⊗⊆ZFP : {A B x : HOD} → ( A ⊗ B ) ∋ x → def ZFProduct (& x) +-- ⊗⊆ZFP {A} {B} {x} lt = subst (λ k → ord-pair (& k )) {!!} op-cons +